« Back To BSA Innovation Engine

Tim McCandless

Tim McCandless
Member since : Jun-04-2009 (Verified)
1 Ideas, 4 Comments, 88 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

The organization of new units is one of the greatest legacies that a professional Scouter and/or a volunteer can give to a neighborhood or community. To do right, organizing a new unit is also a very challenging task to complete.

The BSA has an excellent method established for unit organization as outlined in the Membership Committee Guide book. Our process is built on a foundation of year-round unit organization including ongoing prospecting for chartering organizations and following the twelve step process. This is all excellent.

However, for many years, our recognition of unit organization for professionals has revolved around CSEWC/High Five on June 30th and Quality District/Council on December 31st. I believe that the pressure placed on professional Scouters to organize new units around these 2 deadlines has contributed to the problem of professionals doing most or all of the unit organization with little or no involvement by our volunteers. Professionals often feel compelled to do everything within their power to have new units organized by these two deadlines. This often results in taking shortcuts, not following the twelve steps, and not involving volunteers (feeling that it is easier to do themselves and don’t want to rely on volunteers to meet their deadlines which have a major impact on their performance reviews.) Plus, since volunteers are not evaluated based on their completion of new units by our two deadlines, they are not motivated to work with our professionals to meet the deadlines.

We should consider a different incentive and recognition of our professionals (and volunteers) for unit organization.
When a new professional organizes his or her first new unit following the process and certified by his/her staff leader, he or she should receive immediate recognition from the organization. Maybe a letter from the regional director or the chief, plus some other recognition. Then (like in the real estate and insurance business) have a level of “clubs”: the “Five Unit Club”, then the “Ten Unit Club”, “Twenty Unit Club” etc. and there should be significant recognition for professionals that achieve these levels of accomplishment in unit organization.

This would be a useful tool for a staff leader to coach his staff towards. The leader coaches the brand new D.E. towards organizing his/her first unit in order to be recognized. Then coaches toward the next 4 units in order to be further recognized etc. This would be a more long term approach to unit organization, would tie in well with our new SMART goals and the PDS system, and would complement the W.D. Boyce New Unit Organizer Award for volunteers.

All units that count towards the recognition should be certified by the staff leader to have included volunteers in the organization process and to have completed all of the necessary steps to help that unit have a solid start. (It should not recognize, however, instances when a professional is sometimes “handed” one or more new units as can sometimes happen in a LDS ward split, for example.)
Total Rows   421
Displaying 1 to 25

Comments Posted

Tim McCandless 16 days ago
I like the idea. Regarding whether it is a parental responsibility, it can certainly be argued that it is also a parent responsibility to teach their boys values, not the Boy Scout's.
Tim McCandless 2 months ago
We have shot ourselves in the foot. We have excellent membership and unit development processes that we espouse in our manuals and teach to staff. However, the reality is that we have created such pressure for staff to meet the deadlines of June 30th and December 31st in particular and month-end in general.

Many staff feel so pressured that they take shortcuts in the process and take responsibility back from the volunteers (or never give to them in the first place) and do it themselves in order to meet our articificial deadlines. Instead of relationship building, we become focused on getting the bodies in the door, getting apps filled out, all signatures complete, and then turned in to the registrar. Then sit back and wipe the sweat off the brow--then back to the same process for the next deadline.

Another factor is that our internally imposed requirements for paperwork, positions, signatures, etc. have become so onerous that organizing a new unit is truly a monumental undertaking. In some cases, the recruitment of leaders is easy compared to the completion of all of the processes necessary to charter a unit. Staff become too involved in process and do not have the time for relationship building.

Finally, why do we kick boys out of Scouting when they turn 11 years old and force them to tell us that they want to continue as a Boy Scout and, in fact, require them to reapply for membership as a Boy Scout? We also do this for adults. The transition from Cub Scouts to Boy Scouts is a huge stumbling block in our program. A boy (and adults) should stay in Scouting until they tell us that they don't want to continue--we should make it natural to continue from Cub Scouts to Boy Scouts.

Instead, we throw up internally created obstacles that make force our youth and adults to make a decision on whether to continue or not. Once they join, it should be a natural progression that they continue until they tell us they don't wish to anymore.
Tim McCandless 4 months ago
I agree that the Cub Scout advancement and awards program has grown way to complex over the year. Most leaders do not understand it and most packs do not use all or even most of the potential awards--it is overwhelming to try to understand it all.
Tim McCandless 4 months ago
What's a "camp card"?