« Back To BSA Innovation Engine

bhendley

bhendley
Member since : Nov-09-2008 (Verified)
1 Ideas, 12 Comments, 65 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

Has anyone given consideration to a staff position on the National or Regional level that specializes in unit organization and recruiting to support local councils? Would it be beneficial to all to have a person that can go to individual councils for boots-on-the-ground, one-on-one or small group, hands-on, on-the-job training?
Some councils, especially small ones, are cash strapped and consequently are shorthanded. The SE is not in a position to spend much time training the new field executive(s), especially in the area of recruiting and unit organization. The new professional is handed a book or DVD and told to read it and get after it. We all know this happens, and agree that it is not the best situation but it is reality. It is not what we like or want, but outside conditions force this upon us at times. Yes, CPD teaches recruiting in PDL-1, but they are only able to spend a small amount of time on it, and with a large group at that, so there is not the advantage of one-on-one or small group instruction, hands-on teaching, nor is there the luxury of working out detailed methods suitable for specific areas of a school system, district, council, or even state.
For one reason or another, many councils and/or districts don’t have volunteers who have the time and/or talent to do good boy talks and roundups, and thus the councils are in membership decline. The Regional Recruiting Specialist (or whatever other title you might think appropriate) could come in and spend a few days or a week working with both field staff and volunteers to help get them up to speed, or to help polish their techniques. The Recruiting Specialist could also host cluster/area training seminars from time to time, so that several councils could benefit at one time. These training sessions could be held for either professional or volunteer groups, or both.
In some councils that are missing field staff and cannot afford to hire the needed staff, and are desperately needing membership so that they do not lose United Way or special grant funding, this person could come in for a week or two to boost membership. With the right preparation, in one week this person could generate more than 100 new youth for a council that is short handed, and that could pay big dividends for that council at the end of the year.
The Recruiting Specialist could also be invited to visit councils and audit their recruiting/unit organizing procedures to help them identify ways to improve them. A written report could be generated so that in subsequent months, the local council staff could review the suggested improvements to see if they are following the suggested plan, and if it is working. With feedback, our overall methods utilized in various councils could be compared and maybe would bring about changes for the benefit of all. The Specialist could also work with the other National staff to help plan and develop the recruiting plans that are delivered to the local councils each year.
There are some professionals in our organiation that have a special talent when it comes to recruiting and unit organization. There are some guys out there who can recruit 15 and 20 Boy Scouts in one roundup meeting, who can recruit more than 200 Cub Scouts a month, who can start new packs with 25 and more leaders, and who can start 4-6 new units in a month. It seems a waste of their talent to keep them confined to a district in a local council when they could help many more districts and councils succeed.
Total Rows   421
Displaying 1 to 25

Comments Posted

bhendley 3 months ago
So... As of this morning 13 of us think this is a good idea, and 16 do not. I would REALLY like to know why some think this is NOT a good idea. I cannot figure out why someone/some district/some council struggling with membership losses would not want someone to come in and help them...

PLEASE post your opinions!
bhendley 4 months ago
You can always do the math on the market share. When you only serve, say, 4% of the TAY, for example, you know that the need is there, and the potential is so great. If a United Way by County Report shows no Scouts in a given county (or only 1 pack, etc.), you have a good idea that there are some easy units to organize in those communities. Also, the regional guys know where we have districts that are not being served (council budget won't allow, etc). Seems you could work up some great target areas that way. I think that in some areas (10 council groups), we have enough loss of impact that one guy could be busy for a year or two helping get things back on track.

I love the idea of a governor helping with school access. There are a LOT of guys who could use that kind of help!
bhendley 4 months ago
I thought about the area director (as well as getting retired SE's to volunteer), but a few questions popped into my mind: Does the area director have the expertise like I am suggesting here? Do all area directors have that expertise? Do they have the time to spend like this?

See why I think it might need to be a new special position?
bhendley 5 months ago
A few years ago I worked with the Extreme Makeover- Home Edition guys on a house for one of the Cub Scouts in my district. I don't want to say anything bad... but those guys do what they want to sell a picture or movie, and what we stand for or want promoted does not mean too much to them. I would be VERY cautious working with a movie company, as we might not like the finished product.

And, yes, I think a Boy Scout starring in a movie would really help elevate us in the eyes of the public.
bhendley 0 years ago
I have done it in Texas, Alabama, and Kentucky. It does not matter if you are in the "Big City" or out in the sticks. I don't think we need to change the name- just our techniques. Too many guys are taking short cuts, and therefore don't get the results.
bhendley 0 years ago
I think it is a great idea- Just be careful how you judge it. Just because a professional scouter thinks it will work does not mean it will. The guy that picks up 50 kids a night/school is the guy to listen to.
bhendley 0 years ago
YOU are signing apps???

You might not know this, but doing so puts you at a serious risk! You might want to talk to some other folks about this and the ramifications of doing so...
bhendley 0 years ago
I habitually recruit 300 to 500 youth per year, and I ALWAYS refer to Cub Scouts or Boy Scouts. I don't have much of a problem with kids not liking the name.

I also wear a campaign hat, shorts, and knee-high red top socks.

I don't see anything wrong with the name Boy Scouts. It works for me!
bhendley 0 years ago
In our council, we have taken it a step further. We have a 3 day work week. We REALLY believe in saving on utilities!

Provided, of course, we have completed all we have to get done for each week. Most of the time, we don't get it all done, so we work 5 or 6 days each week. It is surprising, though, that on weeks like Thanksgiving and Christmas, we seem to get it all done and do indeed have those 3 day work weeks!

bhendley 0 years ago
I also don't think it is the term that you use that makes the difference. I think it is what you tell the boys they can expect, and how you tell them, that makes the difference. I have a habit of taking an entire PE class across a monkey bridge, then hot-sparking some cotton balls, and then telling them if they take the flyer I offer, come to the meeting, and sign up, they can go camping with my troop in a couple weeks and some boys in my troop will teach them how to do it all.

I have signed up (signed apps and money paid) as many as 23 boys in one night. The old fashioned stuff still works!
bhendley 0 years ago
I personally have never given in to the theory that Scouting "Loses" in the race againse sports. Many kids/parents find out that Johnny cannot become a star athlete, and they find that they can have a great time in Scouts- and at my roundups, they find out that Scouting is about a whole lot more than 'activities'- that it is a life changing, ongoing event. I would suggest that if we go back in time a little and stick to the basics, we will find that we can still compete with sports and grow our program.
I hate the idea of FREE. No one puts much value in something so invaluable that it is free. Parents that invest $150 for Johnny to play football will make sure he gets to practice and does not miss a game. I have found out the best way to kill a pack or troop is to make it free for the boys. No one cares much about it after that.

Just my opinion.
bhendley 0 years ago
I thought this was just another part of the District Membership Committee. In my limited experience, I have found we don't really need new positions made, we just need to fill the positions already there. I am afraid that if we set up another patch for the hounds to hunt, we won't get as much talent, drive, and result as we get talk and posturing. A great example I can think of is what we see happening with the Pack Trainer position. I see new patches on uniforms, but very few training reports coming in.
I am glad and proud for you guys if you have been able to get volunteers to take a personal interest in keeping membership growing in your districts/councils!