« Back To BSA Innovation Engine

pbrown

pbrown
Member since : Oct-31-2008 (Verified)
3 Ideas, 8 Comments, 79 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

Like the military, we all have to start out as a District Executive where we fundraise, start new units, increase membership, run a district including recruiting volunteers, managing operations, budgets, activities, health and safety concerns. We perform quality control. Often we also have a camp assignment as well. We are often bureaucrats that check for accuracy in forms. When we excel at the growth areas of this task, we get to move up in the organization.

While that makes the job diverse and interesting, it often makes people above average in maybe one or two tasks, and a master of no one task. Human Resource management would conclude organizations that specialize are better run - they allow those that excel in one or two tasks to focus almost exclusively on those tasks. A one size fits all job description of district executive maybe the thing that needs to change to bring the BSA into the 21st Century. Most job descriptions in the real world have nothing to compare with the DE because the DE's generalize in so much. Because the career path focuses on growth, money, membership, and recruiting, they are the only tasks that are often rewarded - and we need much more than that in our talent pool if we are to be successful. We also need those that excel in unit service and district operations, program, marketing, etc., but may not be good at growing the organization through sales functions. I believe that program, marketing, statistical feedback analysis, and quality operations may be the key to retention and increasing our market share.

Restructuring councils to allow them to hire specialists may help out. I would recommend this be on a trial basis with one or two councils at first - but councils could hire sales and fundraising staff to focus exclusively on FOS, special events, endowments, capital, etc. They could also hire a community outreach staff that grow units, recruit kids, help retain kids, develope relationships, rechartering, etc. A program staff focuses on program, marketing, and activities, and an operations staff focuses on district operations, recruiting, and unit service. This would allow those with the right skills to be put in the right area. Job descriptions may change dynamically depending on which team you work. You could either organize field areas to have a specialist from each area, or you could organize field areas based on entire specialized job tasks. Giving councils different option and seeing which ones excel would help National in knowing which direction to go, or if they should maintain the generalist human resource structure at the entry level.
Please, please, please!!!!

We are doing many things online, please focus on online membership registration. We can allow for people to make digital signatures, pay online, (mark LDS units to bill LDS stakes), and input email addresses for unit leaders, committee leaders, and COR's to digitally sign registration forms as well. As we work to protect our youth, our volunteers have become more frustrated with the added paperwork. It we could streamline this by allowing people to register online, it would revolutionize where I could spend my time (more service to units!!!).
Moderator Comments
11/13/08
From: Gary Butler, Director, Council Solutions Group

This is under consideration pending resources available.
We are adjusting to the way that we communicate in 2008. Right now, we have a standardized training program for us to run district operations according to a set method (Key Three, District Meeting, Roundtable, Commissioner Report Meeting). I think we need to allow for localized adjustments and teach new DE's Total Quality Management with commitment to quality service, and then adjust their district operations based on localized needs (rural, technology-oriented, standing or activity-oriented committees). There should not be a one size fits all. We need to use technology to make district operations more efficient.
Moderator Comments
11/26/08
From: Jamie Shearer, Program Impact Department Manager

Non-traditional methods of district operation are currently being studied by the Council Administration and Board Development Team of the Program Impact Department.
Total Rows   401
Displaying 1 to 25

Comments Posted

pbrown 29 days ago
I'll support any initiative the opens up the talent pool. If it's from within, great! Better yet, allow SE's to be hired from other corporations.
pbrown 29 days ago
I would applaud any and all efforts to specialize what is now the District Executive position. We do too many things and have too many bosses. I would support this initiative as well as have specialized sales and membership staff and program staff. When you can focus on providing just program, or just unit and district service, or just sales and membership you are going to be so much more effective.
pbrown 29 days ago
Great comment! We ought to also provide more career incentives for support staff as well.
pbrown 29 days ago
My only problem with you system is that emails don't count. In our modern world, many of the younger generation use this as a primary point of contact. True that emails don't develope relationships in the same way as phone calls or even face to face, but just because it "seems" easy doen't mean that it won't work. We should communicate with our volunteers in ways that make the most sense to our volunteers. If that's emailing or texting or social networking, we need to adapt.
pbrown 29 days ago
I think if we just sort the idea "winners" that this is good enough recognition.
pbrown 29 days ago
If anything they should raise the age
pbrown 8 months ago
I was under the impression that it was more regimented. Your comments allow me to understand otherwise. What I was after was more flexibility in organization and human resources. Sounds like the BSA has this, but most Councils refect the generalist philosophy.
pbrown 8 months ago
Career path feasibility is great, and this new idea would upset that apple cart. That being said, we are not in the business of creating great career paths - we are in the business of developing character, citizenship, and fitness in youth. We are losing market share every year, so we know there are some systematic problems. I applaud any effort to open up the human resources available for both District Executive positions and mid to top-level Council Executives in order to create an environment of change and creativity. We may stumble in this process, but with all of the Councils out there, we're bound to find some great success opening up this resource lever. Specialization in any industry is preferable to a tenured generalist. We don't need Scout Executives that know how to run districts. We need Scout Executives that know how to build relationships with communities, fundraise on a special events and board level, maintain budget and fiscal control over a million-dollar plus organization, excel at human resources, etc. PM courses do help insiders develope some of these skils, but we shouldn't just limit advancement to insiders. I think many of these negative comments are people that worry about their own careers. If insiders excel, they will be the best candidate for the job even if it is opened to outsiders. That's my philosophy.