« Back To BSA Innovation Engine
Hold Top Hands in Dallas/Ft. Worth
Warning In Progress
There is no question that we need to save money whenever and wherever we can. Regardless of the state of the economy. But instead of cancelling things like Top Hands or other professional training opportunities, we need to find ways to make them more economical without losing the things that make them valuable.

We are too isolated already, and we need to see each other face-to-face to share, learn, be inspired by our leaders and each other, and to stay together as professionals. For most Scout executives and senior managers, Top Hands is our only annual training opportunity.

(By the way, I agree with the decision to cancel Top Hands in 2010. That is a unique year with the many centennial events and the jamboree. I also understand the need to move the National Council Meeting around the nation.)

Why don't we hold the Top Hands meeting each time in Dallas/Ft. Worth?

It could save the national council significant travel, shipping, and housing expense (only essential national staff would need to stay at the hotel.) These savings might even allow the national council to find ways to help local councils with the expense of the meeting.

The central location, proximity to so many large councils, and two airports could help local council transportation expense.

The entire national council professional/pro-tech staff could be available to attend to meet with and support local council leadership.

Local council attendees could visit the National Office to meet with staff before or after the meeting (and could see the Museum.)

The agenda could be modified, and extra activities could be limited, to make the meetings more efficient and economical.
Moderator Comments
3/27/09
From: Marty Teare, Meeting Management Team Leader

Meeting Management is currently in the process of researching sites for future annual and top hands meetings. The idea of holding top hands in the DFW area, as well as the suggestion of holding the annual meeting and top hands back to back are both viable considerations.
Perhaps a survey of Scout executives would be in order to determine the opinions on these issues. A survey worked well for the decision to not hold a Top Hands Conference in 2010.
There are several properties in the DFW area that could accommodate a Top Hands Conference, which might help with “boredom” issue.
Comments
aberger 9 months ago
I voted up your idea, however i can see the danger of Scout Executives who have been around for 10+ years getting a little tired of the same old trip and may choose not to come.
The key will be to make sure there is some real meat to the agenda, if there isn't don't hold one.
Perhaps the reason they canceled this one is becuase they don't have enough on the agenda.
I would rather go once every two years to an awsome conference then every year to a middle of the road conference.
mgriffin 9 months ago
A good agenda is absolutely the key, regardless of the sequence or location. I like every year because it is a chance to learn, "recharge my batteries," and visit with friends from around the country. But when the agenda is poor....

The 2010 Top Hands was cancelled because the Centennial year is already so full and Top Hands would have been so close to the jamboree.
Gary Savignano 9 months ago
I think your idea has merit and is the out of the box thinking that is needed. Even if it was held in the area of the National office every other year or on a rotation basis it would save, I believe a significant amount of money.

I would go further and suggest that instead of having two main meetings a year, Top Hands and the National meeting, that those two meetings were combined to a one location, week-long or 6 day meeting. This would save money on a national level as well as on the local council level. It could be something like "check in Sunday for the National meeting, have your opening dinner on Sunday night, wrap up Tuesday, roll into Top hands in Tuesday with a wrap up on Wednesday".

I understand that would be a lot for the national presenters. Perhaps a day between would be needed. In these economic times, costs saving measures are necessary and for councils which are on the line as far as the budget goes, taking two trips is a lot to swallow. I would suggest that a task force review this option for feasibility.
Steve Harris 7 months ago
With the development of a permanent Jamboree site, couldent large meetings be held there? I may be one of a very few who would enjoy the outdoor experence coupled with information and meetings. There would be more than enough room for any size group, it should save money in many different ways, and be a great opportunity for team building. We are Scouts and should truly lead by example.
Judy Sizemore 5 months ago
Status Changed from Active to In Progress.
Activity Chart
Controversy Meter
Share
RSS 
  • Users Tracking (4)